Responsive Menu

Announe IconGenerative AI Governance: Addressing Risks and Ensuring Security | March 5th


What Are The Best Ways To Build Your Process Pipeline? 

Article by Matt Galo | July 26, 2023


Discover the Best Strategies for Building an Effective Process Pipeline – A Comparison of Manual Process Discovery and Process Mining Technologies. Learn how to streamline your operations and boost efficiency with expert insights on the two most effective approaches.

What are the best ways to build your process pipeline? 

How you build your process pipeline plays a significant part in determining the outcomes of your automation projects. There are two methods that are commonly used to find the best processes to automate. These are manual process discovery and process mining technologies.

Let’s have a closer look at these two methods to understand which might be the more viable option for your organization.

Manual Process Discovery vs Process Mining Technologies  

Manual process discovery involves identifying, analyzing, and documenting business processes through interviews, surveys, and observations. The process is typically carried out by a team of process analysts who gather information from different stakeholders to map out the process flow. Manual process discovery can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, but it provides a more detailed understanding of the process and allows for greater flexibility in adjusting the process flow. 

However, manual process discovery entails several steps. 


The first step is analyzing the functional structure of the organization through interviews with managers. These interviews provide insights into the workflows, dependencies, and specific tasks performed by different departments and teams. By understanding the functional structure, it becomes easier to identify key processes and areas that could benefit from automation.



Once the functional structure is analyzed, the next step is to identify the key roles involved in the processes. This is done by distributing questionnaires or conducting interviews with individuals that occupy these roles. The goal is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the major tasks performed by each role, including their frequency and any interactions with other processes or roles. 


After identifying the key tasks, the next step is to evaluate their potential for automation. Factors such as rule-based decision-making, repetitive nature, volume of tasks, and availability of digital data or interfaces are considered during this evaluation. Tasks that exhibit a high potential for automation are prioritized for further analysis.  


In the final step, automation solutions are formulated for the identified tasks. This involves a deeper analysis of the high potential tasks to develop practical and effective automation strategies.  

The nuances of these steps make manual process discovery not only time-consuming but also error prone. It thus increases the downtime and maximizes the scope of potential failures of error mitigation. 

Process mining technologies, on the other hand, are software-based tools that use data from event logs to discover, monitor, and improve business processes. Unlike manual process discovery, it can be automated, thereby establishing a streamlined workflow of data collection and analysis.  The steps involved include: 


Process mining technologies analyze event logs from various sources such as databases, ERP systems, and other applications to extract process-related data.  


This data is then used to create process maps and visualizations, which help identify bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and opportunities for automation.  

Overall, process mining is often faster and more accurate than manual process discovery, but it requires a significant amount of data and may not capture all the nuances of the process. Regardless, it reduces downtime and minimizes the scope of human errors to a great extent. 


Manual process discovery and process mining are two different methods that use different strategies to build your process pipeline. At the same time, each fulfills distinct requirements of the process which makes up a substantial factor for their unique advantages over the other. Simultaneously, both approaches have their exclusive challenges. Considering all these, ultimately, the choice between manual process discovery and process mining technologies depends on the specific requirements of your business and the available resources.

Matt Galo

Chief Revenue Officer & Partner

Matt Gallo is a Partner and the CRO of Accelirate. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Miami and is a seasoned expert in cloud strategies and automated solutions.

More Articles

Enhancing Salesforce Automation with UiPath: Streamlining Workflows for Improved Efficiency

How well-versed are you with the dynamic integration of UiPath and Salesforce? How does it work in reshaping the landscape of enterprise automation? If these questions get you thinking, you are at the right place. This thought leadership piece by industry expert, Matt Gallo, delves into the strategies reshaping digital workflows, from seamless automation to the AI-powered revolution.

February 21, 2024

API vs Ui Automation

Every business today wants to be efficient, and they want efficient integration faster than ever. Streamlining is needed for that, and two powerful tools have emerged: API connections and Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Deciding which tool to choose for automation requires an individual to deeply understand the task and desired goals.

September 21, 2023

Can Generative AI Service and Robotic Process Automation Be Integrated?

Generative AI Services & Robotic Process Automation have emerged as the pillars of the creation of the modern problem-solving world. As we move forward with such innovations, an inevitable question arises.

August 25, 2023